CarMaker

Annual sustainability report for a ficticious company that manufactures cars.

Green House Gas Emissions

Progress report

We have taken several measures to reduce our green house gas emissions since we embarked on our sustainability journey. We are very pleased that our emissions have reduced again this year.

Scope 1 progress

We have improved plant efficiency 23% over the last two years which is the most significant contributor to our progress. We have also reduced our scope 2 emissions by actively increasing the amount of renewable electricity we purchase despite their being an increase in the monetary cost to doing this.

Scope 2 progress

We have also reduced our scope 2 emissions by actively increasing the amount of renewable electricity we purchase despite their being an increase in the monetary cost to doing this.

However, the current constraints on electricity supply means we may have to purchase more non-renewable electricity

Scope 3 progress

We continue to work with our supply chain to reduce their emissions.

A number of suppliers have suffered constraints following the global energy crunch and we suspect in the short term our Scope 3 emissions will increase.

Targets and progress against targets

Target-2050-001

	Data
Name of target	Reduced direct energy usage
Type of target	http://www.xbrl.org/sig/dsd/example26-concepts#Absolute
Description of target	Our total direct energy usage should be less than this number (it is an absolute target).
Date of target baseline	2019
Target	15,000

Target-2050-002

	Data
Name of target	Reduced Scope 1 GHG emissions
Description of target	Our Scope 1 emissions should be less than this amount of our base line usage (it is an absolute target).
Date of target baseline	2019
Target (tCO2e, decimalItemType)	1.5
Target (tCO2e, ghgEmissionsItemType)	1.5

Target-2050-003

	Data
Name of target	Reduced GHG emissions
Type of target	http://www.xbrl.org/sig/dsd/carmaker-extension#InnovativeTargetType
Description of target	Our scope 1 and scope 2 GHG emissions should be reduced to less than 50% of our base line usage (it is a relative target).
Date of target baseline	2019
Target (%, decimalItemType)	50
Target (%, percentItemType)	50

Target-2050-202

	Data
Name of target	Emissions per employee
Type of target	http://www.xbrl.org/sig/dsd/example26-concepts#Intensity
Description of target	The ratio of emissions to employees.
Date of target baseline	2019
Progress	We are determined to get and stay within this range. Our most recent data on employees and emissions suggests we have been as low as 1.4 tCO2e per employee this year but on average have been at 1.6 tCO2e per employee this year.
Target (string)	1 to 1.5 tCO2e per employee per annum
Target (tCO2e per employee per annum, decimalItemType)	1.5

Intensity ratios

Emissions intensity

	Data	Units
Emissions intensity	0.00000098	tonnes CO2e per Euro of net revenue

Energy intensity

	Data	Units
Energy intensity	0.018	Gigajoules per million Euro of net revenue

Water intensity

	Data	Units
Emissions intensity	0.0000004	cubic metres per Euro of net revenue

Carbon offsetting

We have used two different organisations to purchase carbon offset credits, firstly PlantsAndTrees who are local to our operations here in Leyland. They have a number of land areas in Australia, Canada and Chile that contain the forestry related to our certified offsets. The second organisation is called OffsetFinance and they are also a registered trading platform but they do not have a complete list of source countries. They do list Peru Spain and Zimbabwe. We are reviewing our future relationship with them. [2]

(pie chart removed)

Country	Percentage of carbon offsets purchased by tCO2e
Australia	20%
Canada	20%
Chile	40%
Spain	10%
Other	10%

Hidden facts (shown for illustrative purposes)

Non material facts set to nil:
example26:TotalEnergyConsumedCost(end)
example26:DescriptionOfScope2Progress(end)

Non material facts:
http://www.xbrl.org/sig/dsd/example26-concepts#DescriptionOfScope2Progress http://www.xbrl.org/sig/dsd/example26-concepts#TotalEnergyConsumedCost

[1] The type of target in the report is intensity: http://www.xbrl.org/sig/dsd/example26-concepts#Intensity

[2] Carbon offset source countries:

Country	XML expanded name
Australia	https://xbrl.org/2023/iso3166/2023-11-23/PR/2024-01-31#AU
Canada	https://xbrl.org/2023/iso3166/2023-11-23/PR/2024-01-31#CA
Chile	https://xbrl.org/2023/iso3166/2023-11-23/PR/2024-01-31#CL
Spain	https://xbrl.org/2023/iso3166/2023-11-23/PR/2024-01-31#ES
Peru	https://xbrl.org/2023/iso3166/2023-11-23/PR/2024-01-31#PE
Zimbabwe	https://xbrl.org/2023/iso3166/2023-11-23/PR/2024-01-31#ZW

Green House Gas Emissions

	2020	2019	2018
			(000 tCO2e)
Green House Gas Emissions (scope 1)	3.1	2.2	1.0
- Transportation	0.7	0.5	0.1
- Manufacturing	2.4	1.7	0.9
Green House Gas Emissions (scope 2)	5.1	5.2	5.0
Carbon offset	2.5	2.2	0.5

Green House Gas Emissions targets

	2020	2025	2030
			(000 tCO2e)
Green House Gas Emissions (scope 1)	3.0	2.7	2.2
Green House Gas Emissions (scope 2)	5.0	4.4	3.8
Carbon offset	3.0	4.5	6.0

Green House Gas Emissions actuals and forecast

	2018	2019	2020 (actual)	2025	2030
					(000 tCO2e)
Green House Gas Emissions (scope 1)	1.0	2.2	3.1	2.9	2.2
Green House Gas Emissions (scope 2)	5.0	5.2	5.1	4.7	4.1
Carbon offset	0.5	2.2	2.5	3.1	5.0

Energy Consumed

	2020	2019	2018
Total energy consumption (MWh)	24,200	15,500	11,350
- From renewable sources (MWh)	5,566	3,875	3,178
- (as a percentage)	23	25	28
- From non-renewable sources (MWh)	18,634	11,625	8,172
- (as a percentage)	77	75	72

TOTAL ENERGY COST

	2020	2019	2018
			(millions of USD)
Cost of carbon offsetting	0.10	0.07	0.005
Cost of energy	2.51	1.75	1.200
- Cost of renewable energy	0.63	0.38	0.420